Skip to main content
Proof Assistants Beta

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • $\begingroup$ Are you compiling to a low-level language, so that you cannot reconstruct the original terms from the compiled code, or are you just trying to store type-checked internal version of terms for fast loading later on? $\endgroup$
    – Andrej Bauer
    Commented Jun 15 at 8:12
  • $\begingroup$ Just storing type-checked internal versions of terms. $\endgroup$
    – Mike Shulman
    Commented Jun 15 at 15:21
  • $\begingroup$ This sort of feels like a question for langdev.stackexchange.com (though I'd specifically ask about "implementing symbol resolution in separate compilation") $\endgroup$
    – cody
    Commented Jun 17 at 20:39
  • $\begingroup$ Cool, I didn't know about langdev.stackexchange.com, thanks! $\endgroup$
    – Mike Shulman
    Commented Jun 18 at 20:17