Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I think this is not the complete story, because the paper also says that the computation rule is interpreted judgmentally. It seems to be written prior to the problems with regularity being noticed. So, the paper is making a distinction between "judgmental" and "definitional" equality for the computation rule. I'm not sure this is a universally/widely recognized distinction, though. $\endgroup$
    – Dan Doel
    Commented Jul 12, 2022 at 20:49
  • $\begingroup$ @DanDoel yes, it is written prior to the problems with regularity being noticed. $\endgroup$
    – ice1000
    Commented Jul 13, 2022 at 18:24