Skip to main content

Timeline for Formalizations of unsolved problems

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 31, 2022 at 19:04 comment added Timothy Chow By contrast, if there is no generally accepted formalization of the conjecture, and someone produces a formal proof from scratch, then we know they've proved something, but it's not clear whether what they've proved is actually the famous conjecture.
Mar 31, 2022 at 19:03 comment added Timothy Chow The danger of incorrectly formalized statements is a real one. On the other hand, if the statement is formalized correctly, then there is a plus side in the case of well-known open problems for which false proofs are regularly proposed. Namely, someone who claims to have solved the problem can be challenged to provide a formal proof of the already-formalized statement. If the already-formalized statement can be formally proved, then that should remove any doubts about the correctness of the proposed proof.
Mar 23, 2022 at 14:05 comment added Andrej Bauer It would, except that I would say that statements presuppose some rather than "imply" them. For example, the statement "the largest perfect number is not divisible by 13" presupposes there is a largest perfect number.
Mar 23, 2022 at 10:43 comment added Joachim Breitner Would it be worth adding the point that often statements already implies that some things hold (e.g. if a statement uses “the”, or implies the existence of something, or uses definitions that have some precondition as arguments). It's an extension of your point 1, but maybe worth pointing out.
Mar 22, 2022 at 16:59 comment added Jason Rute This is basically the answer I also had in mind. I think if the FA project ever gets off the ground, that open problems could possibly be fair game (of course labeled as such), but it unfortunately hasn't got going.
Mar 22, 2022 at 16:52 history answered Andrej Bauer CC BY-SA 4.0