Edit - Politics Stack Exchange

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Rev

The Economist's article references Starfish Prime which makes for interesting reading about sat failure rates. Nothing like the OP's nonchalance about "laws of exponentials".
– Italian Philosophers 4 Monica
Commented Feb 16 at 19:53
@ItalianPhilosophers4Monica: indeed, and that was with 1960s electronics, which were a lot less sensitive/miniaturized.
– got trolled too much this week
Commented Feb 16 at 21:35

Add a comment |

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)
<https://example.com>
[example](https://example.com)
<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »