Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • 3
    So UN's estimate is around only 44% (138/307) civilian deaths caused by the regime. Quite interesting. They assign a much larger civvie death toll being due to "Islamic factions" (87K --28%) than the London-based NGOs do. Commented Nov 20, 2023 at 21:19
  • There is however an equally (85K) large chunk of "unknown" in UN's data. And "Islamic factions" are counted apart from ISIS too (18K). Commented Nov 20, 2023 at 21:25
  • I've edited in a para where they calculate some percentages themselves. I hope you don't mind. My own calcs in comments above are a bit off from that. Can't be bothered to re-check why... Commented Nov 20, 2023 at 21:44
  • 3
    I wouldn't worry overmuch about the exact number. The whole thing seems a bit guesstimated, as could be expected. The UN probably has better access to government areas but you can still bet Assad will try to softball things. Wonder what Russian contributions were? General "Armageddon" Surovikin got his nickname somewhere. And so did "Butcher" Dvornikov Commented Nov 20, 2023 at 21:47
  • Yeah, the UN punts on Russia vs Iranian militias etc. They do have a table (A5) with heavy weapons vs small arms. It's about 50/50 on that too (81K vs 76K), which may seem a bit implausible. OTOH if the advancing troops shot civilians in the "opposing neighborhood" on sight, that's less implausible. Commented Nov 20, 2023 at 21:52