Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

7
  • 3
    There might be just one past, but there are many different ways to interpret it
    – Justas
    Commented May 31, 2023 at 11:24
  • 2
    @Justas, exactly. This is why the Conservatives "have more unity" yet not "are unanimous". Commented May 31, 2023 at 12:22
  • 3
    @Justas and also, people might like some aspects of the past but not all, and might disagree on which aspects of the past are worth keeping and which should be changed.
    – Esther
    Commented Jun 1, 2023 at 14:33
  • 4
    In the old USSR, there were many pasts, but only one future. Commented Jun 1, 2023 at 15:23
  • 1
    The word 'liberal' has multiple definitions and the one the question is using is not the same as the one you're using. In America, what is considered 'liberal' in modern contexts is precisely what you describe as 'progressive' and 'progressive' tends to carry the connotation of being simply the more extreme wing of the left (e.g. the "Progressive Caucus.") Classical liberalism (which is more what you appear to be referring to) is not just different, but almost completely unrelated and, in many instances, the opposite of modern U.S. liberalism, especially in the realm of economics.
    – reirab
    Commented Jun 1, 2023 at 21:27