Timeline for Why is sending so few tanks to Ukraine considered significant?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2023 at 18:10 | history | edited | NoDataDumpNoContribution | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 66 characters in body
|
| Jan 21, 2023 at 17:37 | comment | added | ScottishTapWater | If I'm not mistaken the Challenger 2 holds the record for the longest confirmed armour kill in history | |
| Jan 21, 2023 at 17:33 | history | edited | NoDataDumpNoContribution | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 6 characters in body
|
| Jan 21, 2023 at 17:33 | comment | added | NoDataDumpNoContribution | @ScottishTapWater Not only this. It also has a greater firing range. For example during the Iraq War it was M1 Abrams against T72 and the US troops basically came out unscathed of every single tank fight. | |
| Jan 21, 2023 at 9:25 | comment | added | ScottishTapWater | I'd like to add, there's no might about Challenger 2s being more effective than the Russian tanks... With the exception of the most recent Russian tanks (that are few and far between), the Challenger 2 could quite comfortably take multiple hits from a Russian tank and keep fighting | |
| Jan 19, 2023 at 18:16 | history | edited | NoDataDumpNoContribution | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Jan 19, 2023 at 18:10 | history | answered | NoDataDumpNoContribution | CC BY-SA 4.0 |