Skip to main content
Notice removed Improve details by Timur Shtatland
Bounty Ended with Lawnmower Man's answer chosen by Timur Shtatland
Question Unprotected by Timur Shtatland
Notice added Improve details by Timur Shtatland
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by Timur Shtatland
Tweeted twitter.com/StackPolitics/status/1615997514146004993
for accuracy
Source Link

It is reported that thousands of tanks are currently being used in the Ukraine War. To help Ukraine, Britain is sending 14 Challenger 2 tanks and America is sending a few (50) Bradley infantry fighting vehicles, which seems like a small number compared to the total number of armored vehicles in the current war. Meanwhile, according to some estimates,

Russia may have around 17,300 tanks produced between the late 1950s and now.

Why is this considered to be a significant event, given that the number of armored vehicles being sent is in the double digits?

It is reported that thousands of tanks are currently being used in the Ukraine War. To help Ukraine, Britain is sending 14 Challenger 2 tanks and America is sending a few Bradley infantry fighting vehicles, which seems like a small number compared to the total number of armored vehicles in the current war. Meanwhile, according to some estimates,

Russia may have around 17,300 tanks produced between the late 1950s and now.

Why is this considered to be a significant event, given that the number of armored vehicles being sent is in the double digits?

It is reported that thousands of tanks are currently being used in the Ukraine War. To help Ukraine, Britain is sending 14 Challenger 2 tanks and America is sending a few (50) Bradley infantry fighting vehicles, which seems like a small number compared to the total number of armored vehicles in the current war. Meanwhile, according to some estimates,

Russia may have around 17,300 tanks produced between the late 1950s and now.

Why is this considered to be a significant event, given that the number of armored vehicles being sent is in the double digits?

Note that the Bradley is not really a tank, just like a turbofan-powered cargo plane is not a fighter jet. Minor improvements in wording and formatting.
Source Link

Why is sending so few tanks to Ukraine considered significant?

It is reported that thousands of tanks are currently being used in the Ukraine war currentlyUkraine War. To help Ukraine, Britain is sending 14 ChallengerChallenger 2 tanks and America is sending a few Bradley tanksBradley infantry fighting vehicles, which seems like a small number compared to the total number of tanksarmored vehicles in the current war. Meanwhile, according to some estimates,

Russia may have around 17,300 tanks produced between the late 1950s and now.

Why is this considered to be a significant event, given that the number of tanksarmored vehicles being sent is in the double digits?

Meanwhile, according to some estimates, "Russia may have around 17,300 tanks produced between the late 1950s and now."

Why is sending so few tanks Ukraine considered significant?

It is reported that thousands of tanks are being used in the Ukraine war currently. To help Ukraine, Britain is sending 14 Challenger tanks and America is sending a few Bradley tanks, which seems like a small number compared to the total number of tanks in the current war.

Why is this considered to be a significant event, given that the number of tanks being sent is in the double digits?

Meanwhile, according to some estimates, "Russia may have around 17,300 tanks produced between the late 1950s and now."

Why is sending so few tanks to Ukraine considered significant?

It is reported that thousands of tanks are currently being used in the Ukraine War. To help Ukraine, Britain is sending 14 Challenger 2 tanks and America is sending a few Bradley infantry fighting vehicles, which seems like a small number compared to the total number of armored vehicles in the current war. Meanwhile, according to some estimates,

Russia may have around 17,300 tanks produced between the late 1950s and now.

Why is this considered to be a significant event, given that the number of armored vehicles being sent is in the double digits?

Question Protected by Philipp
Make title better match body
Link
cjs
  • 2.3k
  • 12
  • 27

Why do NATO countries send such a low amount of military equipment tois sending so few tanks Ukraine considered significant?

Edited tags. Added a reference with the number of tanks RF has, to put the tank numbers into proper context.
Source Link
Timur Shtatland
  • 12.5k
  • 2
  • 33
  • 83
Loading
edited tags
Link
Timur Shtatland
  • 12.5k
  • 2
  • 33
  • 83
Loading
Became Hot Network Question
Tried to improve clarity of the question
Source Link
JonathanReez
  • 51.4k
  • 35
  • 244
  • 454
Loading
tried to improve the question + added relevant tags
Source Link
Alexei
  • 53.4k
  • 43
  • 189
  • 349
Loading
Source Link
D J Sims
  • 1
  • 1
  • 10
  • 32
Loading