Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

17
  • 6
    In fact, soldiers have a duty not to obey illegal orders, which is rather different from having an option not to obey them as stated here. In other words, the last sentence should read "...must not be obeyed."
    – phoog
    Commented Nov 13, 2020 at 20:38
  • 4
    Most US military members wouldn't know an illegal/unconstitutional order if it hit them in the face. The number of them that have actually read the constitution is probably less than 1%. The good news is, whatever that number is, its probably an order of magnitude higher than the percentage of american citizens that have read that doc.
    – john doe
    Commented Nov 13, 2020 at 21:40
  • 2
    @JamesK In common usage, both "Could care less" and "Couldn't care less" mean the same thing, at least in the US
    – divibisan
    Commented Nov 13, 2020 at 21:58
  • 1
    I never knew that! That makes no sense to me...but I know language isn't logical. That is not just illogical it is "head over heels" counterfactual... Oh well. I'm pretty sure that in the UK it is always "couldn't care less"
    – James K
    Commented Nov 13, 2020 at 22:12
  • 2
    Could he simply sack generals without replacing them, until he reached someone low enough down the command chain who would obey his orders? Commented Nov 13, 2020 at 22:57