Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

9
  • 5
    I think this is largely correct, but it needs some references. Also it seems evident that Trump is very much out of sync with Europe on this agreement, so, when you begin with "They are not" that's a tricky argument. Not necessarily wrong, but you need more evidence if you want that argument to fly.
    – userLTK
    Commented May 9, 2018 at 18:42
  • 4
    The US and the EU are not out of sync, Trump and the EU is. I guess I should make that clearer ?
    – xyious
    Commented May 9, 2018 at 20:28
  • 1
    @xyious - interesting perspective (+1). However, from the EU's perspective Trump's decision means US's perspective, doesn't it?
    – Alexei
    Commented May 9, 2018 at 21:32
  • 2
    Not necessarily. While the average EU citizen will likely not make a distinction between "Trump", "The US Government" and "The US", the EU lawmakers are quite aware of the situation at the top of the US government. It's no secret to them (and he has demonstrated that in person) that Trump doesn't listen to his advisers, ignores allies and doesn't give much consideration to the eventual effects of his policies.
    – xyious
    Commented May 10, 2018 at 16:00
  • 9
    [citation needed] in regards to "the majority of lawmakers... agree to the benefits of the deal." There's a reason the deal was never ratified as an actual treaty by the U.S. Senate in the first place.
    – reirab
    Commented May 10, 2018 at 19:00