Timeline for Complex split pot semantics for multiple All-In winners with differing amounts
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2012 at 9:49 | comment | added | Loc Nguyen | Your method is error-prone and difficult to maintain. Check my answer :). | |
| Jul 16, 2012 at 9:27 | answer | added | Loc Nguyen | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 28, 2012 at 17:41 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPoker/status/185059002424639488 | ||
| Mar 26, 2012 at 22:14 | vote | accept | Philluminati | ||
| Mar 25, 2012 at 23:44 | answer | added | TacticalCoder | timeline score: 8 | |
| Mar 25, 2012 at 19:13 | history | edited | Philluminati | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 978 characters in body
|
| Mar 25, 2012 at 18:31 | comment | added | Philluminati | It's worth me commenting that to win against a 39 unit pot, having gone all in with 6 units to win back less than 7 is a bit questionable.. which is why I post my understanding of the logic here. | |
| Mar 25, 2012 at 18:30 | history | asked | Philluminati | CC BY-SA 3.0 |