Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with angular-momentum
Search options not deleted
user 269093
The conserved quantity arising from a rotational invariance. Combine with rotational-dynamics for the classical mechanics approach and quantum-mechanics for the QM interpretation
0
votes
$ J^2=(L+S)^2 $ versus $ (P - \frac{q}{c} A)^2 $
I've accepted Dr. Zhou's answer, since I think he was getting at the following, and this is what I think would fill in the dots for my remaining challenges if anyone else is curious. I'm referring to …
- 182
4
votes
2
answers
155
views
$ J^2=(L+S)^2 $ versus $ (P - \frac{q}{c} A)^2 $
The total angular momentum J can be written as $$ J^2 = L^2 + S^2 + 2 L \cdot S .$$ Now, I assume this is a simplification of a more general tensor rule that $$ (M + N )^2 = M^2 + N^2 + M \cdot N + N …
- 182
1
vote
Accepted
Euler's equations and free rotating symmetric top
This is only an addendum to Mike's answer, which is correct.
This may clear up some confusion:
You may be following Taylor's Classical Mechanics, which seems to be the case from your wording. If so, h …
- 182