Skip to main content

All Questions

0 votes
0 answers
32 views

Still having trouble understanding gravitational lensing [duplicate]

The normal diagram used to explain gravitational lensing shows a two-dimensional plane that is deflected by a heavy weight. This is a two dimensional description that requires an extra dimension to ...
Michael Mcgarry's user avatar
11 votes
2 answers
1k views

Features of General Relativity applicable only to 3+1 dimensions?

While studying general relativity, I noticed that much of the theory could easily be generalized from a $(3,1)$-dimensional spacetime to an $(n,1)$-dimensional spacetime without any changes. So, is ...
Ishan Deo's user avatar
  • 1,588
1 vote
0 answers
40 views

What is the lower bound on the dimension of the LOCAL imbedding of a General relativistic Lorentzian manifold in a pseudo-Euclidean spacetime?

What is the lower bound on the dimension of the LOCAL imbedding of a General relativistic Lorentzian manifold in a pseudo-Euclidean spacetime? Imbedding is Isometric embedding to me. What about these ...
Bastam Tajik's user avatar
  • 1,268
0 votes
1 answer
76 views

Does intrinsic curvature in a higher dimension mean that the lower dimensions also exhibit curvature?

If our universe has intrinsic curvature in a higher dimension, would that mean the 3 dimensions that we live in would be curved? and if so would the lower dimensions exhibit intrinsic or extrinsic ...
tariq nazeem's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
364 views

Why does Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler’s Gravitation visualization technique breakdown in dimension $> 4$?

In this chapter we will introduce and discuss at length one of the ways that physicists sometimes visualize “nice” differential forms. In essence, we will be considering ways of visualizing one-forms, ...
More Anonymous's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
77 views

Is there any way to prove that contrarly to a flat 3D space, a curved 3D space can only be constructed in a 4D manifold?

This question is a result of me trying to understand how this universe can be possibly infinite if it isn't infinitely old. So to compare with an area that is flat it can be constructed both in 2D and ...
Krešimir Bradvica's user avatar
4 votes
3 answers
691 views

Why does GTR not need a higher dimension to describe the bending of spacetime?

I am a bit confused on how GTR uses intrinsic curvature instead of extrinsic curvature. Maybe it is just a misunderstanding, but I will do my best to describe my question: If we take an object of $n$ ...
jng224's user avatar
  • 3,778
4 votes
3 answers
182 views

Given that 1D space $\mathbb{R}$ and 3D space $\mathbb{R}^3$ are in bijection, why do we describe our physical world as 3D?

Mostly the reason given is that that three numbers are required to specify a point uniquely in our world. But this is utter nonsense! It has long been mathematically proven that $\mathbb{R}$ is in ...
Atom's user avatar
  • 1,951
0 votes
2 answers
105 views

Connected and disconnected dimensions

The usual way of determining the dimensionality of space is from the number of values needed to define a unique point. However, when choosing a ski, my body is defined by two numbers - my mass and ...
Richard Johnson's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
652 views

What is dimension? What is the size of dimension?

Recently I heard a TED talk by Brian Greene where he was speaking about String Theory working on $(10+1)$ dimensions. Plus he said that we live in only in $(3 +1)$ dimensions. So where are others? ...
Ashwin Balaji's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
262 views

Meaning of $n+1$ dimensions

Is there anything mathematically significant about studying a theory in $n$ dimensions or $m+1$ dimensions if $n=m+1$? For instance in the context of general relativity I hear people talk about the ...
Canonical Momenta's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
80 views

Kaluza-Klein approach and Gauss-Cadazzi approach

Can you tell me the difference or physical application of Kaluza Klein approach and Gauss Codazzi approach? In Kaluza Klein theory, 5 dimensional theory can be dimensional reduced to 4 dimensional ...
phy_math's user avatar
  • 3,622
7 votes
1 answer
384 views

Spacetime has an infinite number of choices for differentiability. Coincidence?

Spacetime can be modelled using a four-dimensional topological manifold. Say we denote the manifold using $(M, \mathcal{O})$ where $\dim M =d$. The structure $(M,\mathcal{O})$ is not sufficient for ...
user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
59 views

Compactification of spacetimes always possible?

Consider a metric in a $n+1$ dimensional spacetime given by \begin{equation} g=\underbrace{g_{tt}(r,t)dt^2 + g_{rt}(r,t)drdt + g_{rr} dr^2}_{g'} +h(t,r,x^A)dx^Adx^B \end{equation} where $h$ is a $n-1$ ...
qwta's user avatar
  • 31
11 votes
2 answers
841 views

Any "connection" between uncountably infinitely many differentiable manifolds of dimension 4 and the spacetime having dimension four?

Self-studying general relativity, I came across a rather mind-blowing statement (for a beginner like me). Maybe this question is a naive one because of my lack of knowledge in differential geometry. ...
Rajath Radhakrishnan's user avatar

15 30 50 per page