Skip to main content

All Questions

0 votes
1 answer
52 views

Square of the Feynman amplitude for $a +b\to c+d$ and its reverse

In quantum field theory, if a process $a +b\to c+d$ is allowed by a certain interaction Lagrangian (hermitian), the reverse process, $c+d\to a+b$, must also be allowed (as far as I understand) by the ...
Solidification's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
73 views

Mandelstam variables sign

I am self-studying the book "Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model" by Schwartz, on page 99 (paragraph "Mandelstam variables"), the context is the $2\rightarrow 2$ scattering ...
Andrea's user avatar
  • 613
-1 votes
0 answers
13 views

Jet events and Deeep Inelastic Scattering (Scaling Behavior) at the same time?

I am a philosopher of physics, so I already apologize for potential ignorance. I have also graduated in physics, but I now analyze problems on another level and also forgot some of the mathematical ...
Dontwastetime's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
83 views

Doubt in $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow W^{+}W^{-}$ scattering

I am trying to understand how to compute the scattering amplitude for the process $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow W^{+}W^{-}$, as a reference one could look at Peskin chapter 21. What I do not understand is ...
Filippo's user avatar
  • 475
0 votes
0 answers
34 views

Relation bitween Mandelstam Variables in three-body final state

What is the relation between Mandelstam variables in the three body final state? There are 5 independent Mandelstam variables. What is the relationship between them?
Andrea's user avatar
  • 11
3 votes
1 answer
112 views

Regge Theory interpretation

I have a question on the physical interpretation of the Regge limit, $$s\gg4m^2\gg|t|$$ where we are in the s-channel physical region and s and t the Mandelstam invariants. Usually, the $s$ is taken ...
roberto's user avatar
  • 71
0 votes
1 answer
45 views

Elastic vs inelastic scattering in particle physics

Does elastic scattering occur via the Z boson and inelastic scattering via the W boson? If so, why? Does it have something to do with the fact that interactions via the Z boson don't change quark ...
user374355's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
46 views

Rutherford scattering closest approach distance

Consider a particle 1 moving towards a particle 2 at rest. In class, my teacher said that in order to derive the minimum approach distance when the impact parameter ( b ) is 0, we had to use ...
Lucas's user avatar
  • 319
13 votes
1 answer
2k views

How does one describe individual particles in QFT in practice?

A similar question was posted on this site at least ten times, but not quite in this formulation, and with no satisfactory answers, so I give it another try. Quantum field theory textbooks almost ...
Daigaku no Baku's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
56 views

High energy collision of two proton

Suppose there are two protons ( as we have in LHC). One proton is coming from +ve z axis and other from -ve z axis toward the collision point(origin). Both proton collide with equal velocity. Now as ...
Keshav's user avatar
  • 49
8 votes
2 answers
2k views

How does a photon "cheat" its way past a neutron?

I learnt here Is a neutron deflected sideways by a laser beam? that a photon beam has no influence on the motion of a free neutron in the first and second approximation. Now I'm interested in what ...
HolgerFiedler's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
179 views

Is a neutron deflected sideways by a laser beam?

Is a freely moving neutron deflected sideways when a laser beam is directed at it from the side? It would be great if the question could be considered from the two points of view that the laser beam ...
HolgerFiedler's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
72 views

Inconsistency in the $2\to 2$ kinematics

I must be confusing something horribly, because this should be very simple, but I am keep getting inconsistent results in the basic 2->2 scattering kinematics. Let the process be $$a(p_1) + b(p_2) \...
Quantization's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
143 views

Proof that Bjorken-$x$ is positive

For a $t$-channel deep inelastic scattering process the Bjorken-$x$ is defined as: $$x=\frac{Q^2}{2p_2\cdot q},$$ where $Q^2:=-q^2$ [in the $(+,-,-,-)$ Minkowski sign convention], $q$ is the ...
pll04's user avatar
  • 337
1 vote
0 answers
49 views

Relation between matrix element of a process with its crossed processes

Consider a process in particle physics denoted by, $$(1) \quad a+b\to c+d$$ which is related to the reverse process $$(2)\quad c+d\to a+b.$$ By virtue of the hermiticity of the interaction Hamiltonian,...
Solidification's user avatar

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5
11