Skip to main content

All Questions

2 votes
1 answer
200 views

Use of sign convention two times in ray optics

In this particular derivation of refraction happening at a spherical surface in terms of its radius of curvature , image and object distance and refractive index is done by my book as shown When we ...
Razz's user avatar
  • 441
0 votes
1 answer
165 views

Sign Convention in Ray Optics

While solving questions on Refraction due to 2 spherical surfaces the sign of the image formed after the first refraction (here at '$A$') depends whether the image formed is towards left or right side ...
Mathematics's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
3k views

Is optical path length (OPL) usually in units of length, or wavelength?

When I do calculations, I usually define optical path length (OPL) of a path as the integral of index $n$ along a path divided by the vacuum wavelength, so that I can get the phase easily. So for a ...
uhoh's user avatar
  • 6,273
4 votes
1 answer
865 views

Deep confusion with conventions and signs in geometric optics

This is an equation given in my book. The question is why have they used a negative sign on the LHS? Now, if you try to derive the mirror equation with simple geometry, you get 1/v +1/u =1/f . I ...
Aaryan Dewan's user avatar
  • 1,770