Skip to main content

All Questions

3 votes
2 answers
106 views

Parametric down-conversion - QFT necessary?

In quantum optics, one ususally starts by quantizing the free electric field and obtains an expression for the electric field operators: $$ E(\vec{r},t) = \sum_{\vec{k},p} C_{\vec{k}} \vec{e}_{\vec{k},...
sqrt6's user avatar
  • 31
4 votes
1 answer
86 views

What happens if obstacles (walls) been put where destructive interference occurs in double slit experiment?

If photon doesn't have probability to be in dark (destructive interference) area, what will be the effect of adding obstacles (walls) in the dark (destructive interference) area for the double slit ...
Wael Khatib's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
86 views

Is the annihilation operator an observable (it is non-Hermitian)?

In most treatments of quantum mechanics that I have seen, observables of a quantum system are defined using Hermitian operators. The most intuitive reason for this is that Hermitian operators have ...
Biophysman's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
88 views

What is the observable for the optical field?

Typically, observables in quantum mechanics are associated with Hermitian operators. However, Glauber argues in 1963 ([1]) that the electric field operator $\hat{\mathbf{E}}(x,t)$ is not the relevant ...
Biophysman's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
55 views

Renormalisation in quantum optics

When reading about QED in QFT books, renormalisation seems to be essential to get results eventually. It also seems absolutely necessary even for low energies, since the internal lines lead to ...
lalala's user avatar
  • 1,831
0 votes
1 answer
56 views

How to distinguish a doppler-shifted photon from a non-doppler-shifted photon of the same frequency?

Can one physically distinguish a photon of frequency $\omega$, generated by a stationary laser, from a photon generated by a mechanically moving laser (a different laser from the first one) which, due ...
Omid's user avatar
  • 342
1 vote
2 answers
78 views

Tightly-focusing a single photon

I'm curious about the feasibility, both theoretically and experimentally, of tightly focusing (or spatially trapping) a single photon to guarantee its precise targeting. If it’s possible, isn’t it ...
Omid's user avatar
  • 342
1 vote
2 answers
53 views

The relative phase of photons in two-photon absorption

In two-photon absorption (TPA), the relative polarization of the two photons about to be absorbed simultaneously by an atom is crucial in determining the TPA rate. However, there is a lack of ...
Omid's user avatar
  • 342
1 vote
0 answers
47 views

Unit polarization vectors in the vector potential for the quantization of the free electromagnetic field

I am studying the quantization of free electromagnetic field using the book "Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics" by Mandel and Wolf (Mandel&Wolf, Chapter 10) and when I started to ...
Uriel Casco D's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
22 views

Field theory behind dipole traps / optical tweezers

I'm trying to re-construct an explain for how an optical tweezer traps a neutral atom with a non-zero dipole. It began something like this: "The vacuum is filed with short-lived dipoles form by ...
Titus's user avatar
  • 21
2 votes
0 answers
55 views

Why does the spontaneous emission rate scale with energy?

Good afternoon, the standard description of spontaneous emission in quantum optics is - to my knowledge - via coupling of an excited atom to vacuum modes of the em-field, which are still occupied at $...
Titus's user avatar
  • 21
0 votes
0 answers
38 views

Microscopic explanation of electromagnetic wave interacting with electron (medium) leading to decrease of light speed

Electromagnetic waves decrease in speed when propagating through a medium. The commonly accepted microscopic explanation is that photons are absorbed by electrons and then re-emitted, resulting in a ...
Wein's user avatar
  • 59
0 votes
0 answers
49 views

Derivation for Quantum optics dipole radiation formula

An often used formula for the radiation field of a dipole is the following one: \begin{align} \vec{E}(t, \vec{x}) = \frac{1}{4 \pi x^3} ( 3 \hat{x} [ \hat{x} \vec{d}(t_r)] - \vec{d}(t_r) ) + \frac{1}{...
Quantumwhisp's user avatar
  • 6,773
3 votes
0 answers
58 views

Quantization of electrodynamics in a nonlinear dielectric medium

Recently I read this paper https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.30.1860 by Hillery and Mlodinow about the (canonical) quantization of electrodynamics in nonlinear dielectric media. They assume that the ...
WillHallas's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
61 views

Description of AMO interactions in terms of QED Lagrangian

I consistently had this question of how could the light-matter interaction be described in terms of the fundamental language of QED. To be more specific, is there a way to 'derive' the interaction ...
류민석's user avatar

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5 6