All Questions
Tagged with locality lagrangian-formalism
32
questions
0
votes
0
answers
22
views
How does locality on space time manifold M put constraints on functions on configuration space of fields?
I am reading David Skinner's notes on AQFT. In Chapter 1 page 3, he mentioned that "purely from the point of view of functions on $C$, locality on $M$ is actually a very strong restriction", ...
2
votes
1
answer
78
views
Are field theories where free energy density depends on 2nd-order derivative non-local?
It is accepted that infinite order of derivatives in field theory lead to non-local effects while finite number of them local.
reference within physics stack exchange
Let’s take a lattice with next-...
0
votes
1
answer
101
views
Understanding this abstract Lagrangian of effective field theory
I'm learning Wilson's approach to renormalization and the Effective Field Theory. Typically, the theory is defined by a Lagrangian valid up to some scale $Λ$. I saw these two definitions for 4-...
2
votes
1
answer
87
views
Locality and local gauge invariance
I was reading this question on the Physics Stack Exchange, and I'm still not quite sure how I can understand the relationship between locality and local gauge invariance using this example. Consider ...
3
votes
2
answers
692
views
Why does one work with the Lagrangian density in field theory?
Why is it necessary to introduce the Lagrangian density (integral of the Lagrangian over volume) when describing the dynamics of fields? Is there a specific reason for that or just for convenience?
1
vote
1
answer
94
views
How constraint to first-order derivative in Lagrangian is a consequence of demand to get local theory?
In Physics From Symmetry Section 4.2 Restriction, the Author said that
It is sometimes claimed that the constraint to first-order derivatives is a consequence of our demand to get a local theory, but ...
2
votes
1
answer
100
views
On the computation of functionals in QFT
Using the Gaussian (path)-integral
$$
\int \mathcal{D}\eta e^{i\int_{t_i}^{t_f} dt \eta(t) O(t) \eta(t)} = N [\operatorname{det} O(t)]^{-1/2}
$$
my book claims that we can compute the following ...
1
vote
1
answer
259
views
Non-analytic functions and non-local Lagrangians
Infinite sums of increasingly higher-order derivatives, when present in Lagrangians, are typically taken as a sign of nonlocality. This is supposed to rule out fractional, negative and exotic (for ...
3
votes
0
answers
64
views
Lattice differentiation and Locality
Assume we define the locality of a theory in the following way:
Assume we have a theory of real scalars, so this theory is non local if the action has terms like
$$\int d^dx\,\phi(x)V(x-y)\phi(y).$$
...
1
vote
1
answer
428
views
QFTs without Lagrangian
I have been reading other questions in this site, but I have not found answers to all my questions about theories without Lagrangians.
What do we mean exactly when we say that they do not have a ...
4
votes
2
answers
165
views
What is locality?
In QFT and statistical mechanics, one is usually interested in studying integrals of the form:
$$Z(\phi) =\int d\mu_{C}(\phi')e^{-V(\phi+\phi')}$$
where $\mu_{C}$ is Gaussian measure with mean zero ...
2
votes
1
answer
200
views
Why does the Lagrangian Density have to be a polynomial of the field?
In a lecture, a professor appeared to have said that the Lagrangian can only contain terms that have powers of $\phi$ and a term with $\partial_\mu \partial^\mu \phi$ . I imagine this would make any ...
4
votes
0
answers
81
views
Decomposition of rank-2 field and local interactions
Any rank-2 tensor can be decomposed in the following way
$$
\phi_{\mu\nu} =\phi_{\mu\nu}^{TT} + \partial_{(\mu}\xi_{\nu)} +\frac{1}{4}T_{\mu\nu}s+\frac{1}{4}L_{\mu\nu}(w-3s)
$$
where $\phi_{\mu\nu}^{...
3
votes
3
answers
543
views
Infinite derivatives, Locality and Lagrangian
Providing the derivative of a single valued function $f(x)$ is like providing its value at two infinitesimally close points.
My question consists of two parts:
Can Higher derivatives be thought of as ...
2
votes
0
answers
150
views
Under what circumstances is the functional derivative (of an action functional) an actual function?
In general, for a functional $F[\phi]$, the functional derivative is
$$\frac{\delta F[\phi]}{\delta \phi} [f(x)] = \lim_{\varepsilon \to 0} \frac{F[\phi + \varepsilon f ] - F[\phi]}{\varepsilon}$$
...