Skip to main content

All Questions

2 votes
0 answers
75 views

Variational description of modified Einstein equations

Let us suppose that we have an Einstein equation of the form $$ R_{(\mu \nu)}-\frac{1}{2} g_{\mu \nu} R=8\pi T_{\mu \nu},$$ where $R$ is an affine connection, which differs from the Levi-Civita ...
ProphetX's user avatar
  • 689
0 votes
0 answers
19 views

What is the boundary action need for topological massive gravity (TMG)?

For pure Einstein gravity with Dirichilet boundary conditions, Gibbons-Hawking-York boundary action is needed to make the variational principle well defined. I am considering the case for topological ...
miranda li's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
53 views

Consistency of substitution of a canonical variable from EoM back into (momentum-less) action

I was reading this answer, where the issue of substituting equations of motion (eoms) into the action is addressed. I am fine with the basic idea that the action principle is destroyed when the eoms ...
Learner's user avatar
  • 53
22 votes
1 answer
4k views

Why is it so coincident that Palatini variation of Einstein-Hilbert action will obtain an equation that connection is Levi-Civita connection?

There are two ways to do the variation of Einstein-Hilbert action. First one is Einstein formalism which takes only metric independent. After variation of action, we get the Einstein field equation. ...
346699's user avatar
  • 5,971
2 votes
0 answers
529 views

Derivation of equations of motion in Nordstrom's theory of scalar gravity?

Nordstrom's theory of a particle moving in the presence of a scalar field $\varphi (x)$ is given by $$ S = -m\int e^{\varphi (x)}\sqrt{\eta_{\alpha \beta}\frac{dx^{\alpha}}{d \lambda}\frac{dx^{\beta}}{...
Andrew McAddams's user avatar