Skip to main content

All Questions

0 votes
1 answer
146 views

What's the difference? $\nabla_\mu e_\nu=\Gamma_{\mu \nu}^\rho e_\rho~\text{ and }~\partial_\mu e_\nu=\Gamma_{\mu \nu}^\rho e_\rho~?$

What's the difference? $$\nabla_\mu e_\nu=\Gamma_{\mu \nu}^\rho e_\rho~\text{ and }~\partial_\mu e_\nu=\Gamma_{\mu \nu}^\rho e_\rho~?$$ In John Dirk Walecka's book 'Introduction to General Relativity',...
Jianbingshao's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
207 views

Christoffel symbol with third index up

Generally the Christoffel symbol of the first kind is defined as $$\Gamma_{\lambda\mu\nu}=\frac12\,(\partial_\nu g_{\lambda\mu}+\partial_\mu g_{\lambda\nu}-\partial_\lambda g_{\mu\nu}) \tag{1}$$ and ...
vyali's user avatar
  • 392
2 votes
0 answers
108 views

Convention of notation $(p,q)$ for the metric signature, which number is first?

This is a really simple question that I fail to quickly find and answer for. The metric signature for Minkowski space or more general Pseudo-Riemannian manifolds is usually denoted by a list of signs ...
Viktor's user avatar
  • 96
1 vote
1 answer
580 views

Scalar curvature of a 2-sphere via the Ricci tensor

Using the usual coordinates on a 2-sphere of radius $r$, I get the metric tensor $g_{\mu\nu}=\text{diag}(r^2, r^2\sin^2\theta)$ and so $g^{\mu\nu}=\text{diag}(1/r^2,1/r^2\sin^2\theta)$. Hence the only ...
Khun Chang's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
124 views

Confusion about convention for curvature tensor

I am a little bit confused about the convention of the curvature tensor. The books of Wald and Misner/Deser/Wheeler seem to have the same conventions, i.e. the indices of the Riemann curvature tensor ...
B.Hueber's user avatar
  • 854
3 votes
1 answer
120 views

The inhomogeneous Maxwell equation ${*}\mathrm d{*}F=J^\flat$ is only true for the signature $(+---)$?

In short, we would expect that considering the Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$ and the Riemannian manifold $(M,-g)$ leads to the same Maxwell equations, i.e. we would expect that $\newcommand{\imult}{\...
Filippo's user avatar
  • 1,801
0 votes
0 answers
75 views

Question about placing of indices in tetrads/vierbein

I'm going to use boldface to denote the metric tensor as a geometric rank 2 tensor and I'll expand it in different basis. First, let's define the coordinate vector and 1-form basis \begin{equation} \...
P. C. Spaniel's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
354 views

Different definitions of Riemann tensor components

Hobson (General Relativity 2006 ed. page 158 eq. 7.13) and Ryder (Introduction to General Relativity 2009 ed. page 124 eq. 4.31) define Riemann tensor components as $$ {R^\alpha}_{\beta\gamma\delta} = ...
Rob Tan's user avatar
  • 882
1 vote
1 answer
205 views

Spin connection raise and lower flat indices

The spin connection $\omega^a_{b\nu}$ is used to define the covariant derivative of a spinor in curved spacetime. I want to explicitly calculate the covariant derivative: $$\nabla_\nu\Psi=(\partial_\...
Aralian's user avatar
  • 505
2 votes
1 answer
246 views

Alternative expression for Riemann curvature tensor

There is the usual expression for the Riemann tensor $$R_{abcd}=\partial_c\Gamma_{adb}-\partial_d\Gamma_{acb}+\Gamma_{ace}{\Gamma^e}_{db}-\Gamma_{ade}{\Gamma^e}_{cb}.$$ However, in the last page of ...
Ivan Burbano's user avatar
  • 3,915
1 vote
1 answer
378 views

Are differential geometric and physics conventions for covariant derivatives consistent?

In a differential geometric setting, the covariant derivative can be defined as a map $\nabla_X:\Gamma(TM)\to\Gamma(TM)$, for any vector field $X\in\Gamma(TM)$, satisfying certain conditions. In other ...
glS's user avatar
  • 14.8k
5 votes
2 answers
248 views

Annoying sign in geometric interpretation of curvature

In this video Susskind gives a heuristic derivation of the curvature formula which I summarize as follows: In a coordinate system, start with a vector $v_A$ at the origin, and extend it to a parallel ...
Pedro's user avatar
  • 592
1 vote
1 answer
149 views

Curvature 2-forms: missing factor 1/2 in (14.21) and (14.22) of Misner, Thorne and Wheeler?

It seems that the correct version of (14.21) is $$ \frac{1}{2}\,\langle d\alpha,u\wedge v\rangle=\partial_u\langle\alpha,v\rangle-\partial_v\langle\alpha,u\rangle-\langle\alpha,[u,v]\rangle $$ where $\...
Kurt G.'s user avatar
  • 1,839
1 vote
1 answer
71 views

Conventions for graded wedge product in supergeometry

There are two conventions for the graded exterior product on superspace (see https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/signs+in+supergeometry): $$\alpha \wedge \beta = (-1)^{pq+|\alpha||\beta|}\beta\wedge\alpha \;...
Gabriel Caro Mendoza's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
142 views

Einstein notation and writing down the geodesic equation - a misunderstanding?

if one wants to write down the geodesic equation to describe the movement of the planets (for i=1 in the following context) one uses the metric tensor $g_{ik}$ for spherical symmetric coordinates. One ...
manuel459's user avatar
  • 448

15 30 50 per page