Skip to main content
Physics

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ duplicate of this now closed post of a week ago. Thus: same comment. You will have to ask te authors. $\endgroup$
    – ZeroTheHero
    Commented Jun 23 at 21:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If you want to gain more understanding of entanglement, the raw data is the last thing you should seek. How about reading their papers? And I would recommend the newer works by Zeilinger over those of Clauser or Aspect, simply because their accuracy is much higher and the language is much cleaner. Try reading this, which is practically a primer on entanglement experiments: arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9810080 Freebee hint: read reference [17] once you understand the main paper. $\endgroup$
    – DrChinese
    Commented Jun 24 at 0:32