Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

8
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Does this answer your question? Why does binding energy of particles, which constitutes most of macroscopic mass, make them harder to accelerate? $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 20 at 5:50
  • $\begingroup$ For even more details, see physics.stackexchange.com/a/804393/364064 $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 20 at 5:53
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure. I guess I'm more looking to understand why potential energy can be treated the same as, say, thermal energy. Kinetic/thermal energy seem very different in character from potential energy, even though they are both forms of energy, and while I can visualize why maybe increasing thermal energy would make acceleration harder, I can't do the same with potential energy. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 20 at 5:59
  • $\begingroup$ I'm trying to understand this more by visualizing what's happening to the individual particles experiencing the potential that makes the system harder to push around. I don't know if this is possible. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 20 at 6:00
  • $\begingroup$ That is why I gave the first comment before the 2nd. You have to stop thinking of inertia as a property of mass. It is a property of energy. When an object has more energy, it will have more inertia, i.e. by definition, harder to push around. When negative potential energy robs that energy, then it becomes easier to push around. There is no visualisation possible. This is purely a mathematical connection, consequence, and not visualisable. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 20 at 6:07