Timeline for Extending the Lagrangian of a double pendulum to systems with more complex shapes
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jun 6 at 18:44 | vote | accept | Riccardo Zanardi | ||
| Jun 6 at 18:35 | answer | added | Luke Pritchett | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 6 at 15:42 | vote | accept | Riccardo Zanardi | ||
| S Jun 6 at 18:44 | |||||
| Jun 6 at 13:58 | answer | added | Eli | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 5 at 16:00 | comment | added | Riccardo Zanardi | [img]i.ibb.co/mcC1Jch/IMG-5666.jpg[/img] Here it is. Don’t mind the funky scale. | |
| Jun 5 at 15:45 | comment | added | Eli | please draw a picture | |
| Jun 5 at 13:32 | comment | added | Riccardo Zanardi | 3D would be optimal, but I can settle with a 2D case — I’m not expecting to use it for a tridimensional system in the foreseeable future. | |
| Jun 5 at 13:21 | comment | added | Luke Pritchett | Do you want these shapes to be able to swing in 3D or keep in 2D like the standard double pendulum? | |
| Jun 5 at 13:06 | history | edited | Vincent Thacker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Jun 5 at 13:01 | history | edited | Vincent Thacker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 71 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Jun 5 at 10:58 | history | asked | Riccardo Zanardi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
![i.ibb.co/mcC1Jch/IMG-5666.jpg[/img]](https://file-hippo.netlify.app/host-https-i.ibb.co/mcC1Jch/IMG-5666.jpg[/img]){kind=link}