Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, I agree. So it's ok to treat the effect of the Sun on the gas cloud as a tidal force proportional to $M/r^3$, where $M$ is the mass of the Sun and $r$ is the distance from the Sun to the cloud, because the size of the cloud is small compared to $r$. But why is it ok to treat the effect of the central portion of the cloud on its outer portion as a tidal force proportional to $M/r^3$, where $M$ is the mass of the cloud and $r$ is the radius of the cloud? I think that's what he's doing, anyway. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 22 at 9:27
  • $\begingroup$ @user3327311 I think $r$ is always the distance from the Sun to the cloud i.e. the radius of the cloud's orbit, not the radius of the cloud itself. I don't think the tidal effect of the cloud on itself is discussed - probably assumed to be not significant. The overall point is that the tidal effect of the sun on the cloud is always greater than the cloud's self-gravitation (as long as the density of the cloud is less than the density of the Sun). $\endgroup$
    – gandalf61
    Commented Apr 22 at 9:34