Skip to main content
Physics

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

8
  • $\begingroup$ @hyportnex thanks! would still be good to understand where my intuition is wrong in my above working though. $\endgroup$
    – psychgiraffe
    Commented Apr 5 at 23:07
  • $\begingroup$ Each loop carries a fixed current kept independently from the other irrespective of their relative positions. In fact, the EM work it takes to keep the currents constant as the loops are moved relative to each other is the magnetic energy stored in the system. To prove $L_{12}=L_{21}$ there is a simple "physical" proof and there is also a straightforward vector calculus based "analytical" proof, both are here: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/150068/… $\endgroup$
    – hyportnex
    Commented Apr 5 at 23:10
  • $\begingroup$ Have you already read p.147? $\endgroup$
    – Peltio
    Commented Apr 5 at 23:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @psychgiraffe uhm... I think it's more what hyportnex said. Let's see if I can give you an alternate pov: keep your coils close, make a current I1 in the first coil and leave the second open. The flux from the first coil will be intercepted by the second one. Now, if you want to pass a current in the second coil to generate a given flux you need to first cancel the flux that was there without current and then build your own flux. So, in one computation this extra cancellation work is not included, while in the other it is. $\endgroup$
    – Peltio
    Commented Apr 6 at 0:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If you wish to understand how the energy gets built to which @Peltio alluded to, please, read Jackson: Classical Electrodynamics, Section 5.16 and then if something is still not clear then ask in a separate new question specifically what steps need clarification. Mutual inductance is in the next Section 5.17 $\endgroup$
    – hyportnex
    Commented Apr 6 at 22:30