Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

9
  • $\begingroup$ "Is there some trick I am missing to explain..." Isn't this explained in the paragraphs following his statement about virtual work and forces? I.e., the paragraphs starting off with: "We can show for our rectangular loop that $U_{mech}$..." $\endgroup$
    – hft
    Commented Apr 3 at 18:35
  • $\begingroup$ But in other words he had to check explicitly that $U_\mathrm{mech}$ was also the work done in bringing in the dipole? It wouldn't be safe to just assume this to be so? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 3 at 18:37
  • $\begingroup$ I am asking because my lecturer did just that; derived the force from the torque without further elaboration like Feynman. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 3 at 18:40
  • $\begingroup$ If you already know the answer then it is safe to assume so... but I think he is trying to explain why this is safe... This seems to be what he is saying in the two sentences surrounding his Eq. 15.11. $\endgroup$
    – hft
    Commented Apr 3 at 18:40
  • $\begingroup$ Hard to say why your lecturer did what they did. $\endgroup$
    – hft
    Commented Apr 3 at 18:42