Timeline for Ward identity in scalar QED; gauge transformations & plane wave solutions for polarization
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 4 at 3:08 | comment | added | ShKol | You already have $A_{\mu} = \epsilon_{\mu}(p)e^{ipx}$. Choose $\alpha = -if(p)e^{ipx}$. This means the gauge transformed field is $A_{\mu} = \epsilon_{\mu}(p)e^{ipx} + \partial_{\mu}(-if(p)e^{ipx}) = ( \epsilon_{\mu}(p) +f(p)p_{\mu})e^{ipx}$ which is the new solution that has been proposed. | |
Mar 3 at 16:54 | comment | added | Sophie Schot | I'm sorry, I don't think I'm quite understanding, do you mean that $\alpha = f(p)p_{\mu}$ generates the proposed ansatz? | |
S Mar 3 at 16:01 | history | suggested | ShKol | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Math notation
|
Mar 3 at 15:13 | comment | added | ShKol | I think you need to show that $\alpha = f(p)e^{ipx}$ generates the proposed ansatz (which you have verified is also a solution to the vacuum equation). | |
Mar 3 at 15:03 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Mar 3 at 16:01 | |||||
Mar 3 at 14:26 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body; edited tags; edited tags
|
Mar 3 at 13:29 | history | edited | Sophie Schot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
S Mar 3 at 13:29 | review | First questions | |||
Mar 3 at 14:27 | |||||
S Mar 3 at 13:29 | history | asked | Sophie Schot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |