Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

8
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ So you say that, although not theoretically impossible, there shouldn't be such a particle given our observations? $\endgroup$
    – Eelvex
    Commented Apr 2, 2011 at 4:25
  • $\begingroup$ @Eelvex: it depends on your definition of theoretically impossible. But yeah, they are basically ruled out by experiment because a world with charged massless particles would be very different from ours. $\endgroup$
    – Marek
    Commented Apr 2, 2011 at 9:34
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @Eelvex: but unlike flying penguins :) youtube.com/watch?v=9dfWzp7rYR4 $\endgroup$
    – Marek
    Commented Apr 2, 2011 at 10:07
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ To be precise, you need to turn your partial derivatives into covariant derivatives to minimally couple the scalar the field to the photon field: $\mathcal{L} = D_\mu\phi^\ast D^\mu\phi$ for $D_\mu = \partial_\mu + ie\hat{Q}A_\mu$. From here, note that the photon-loop diagram would give a mass renormalization. Unless there is some symmetry which protects/prevents the renormalization of the $\phi$ field's mass, there is no reason to assume that this bare Lagrangian should give physically massless particles! $\endgroup$
    – josh
    Commented May 16, 2012 at 4:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Wouldn't the energy of the electrostatic field be the mass an "otherwise" massless particle would have? (I.e, a "massless charged particle" is a contradictio in adjecto, an impossible contradiction by definition.) I actually always wondered whether the electron's rest mass is simply the sum of its electrostatic and weak fields. (There is certainly no "ball" "having" a charge, for example; the electron, like all other "particles", is the field.) $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 15, 2020 at 12:33