Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

14
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the great answer. Though, I want to confirm something and ask it maybe in a clearer way: If in newtonian mechanics, we say ground frame is an inertial frame, then how does the "inertial frames are isotropic" obeyed ? because clearly, $mgy$ is not isotropic. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 9, 2023 at 11:34
  • $\begingroup$ The space itself can still be considered isotropic. The gravitational force in classical mechanics doesn't arise from an anisotropy of space, but rather from stuff (i.e. earth) within that space. This is very different from the treatment chosen in GR, where space(-time) itself is distorted due to massive objects. $\endgroup$
    – KarimAED
    Commented Nov 5, 2023 at 11:18
  • $\begingroup$ @GiorgiLagidze I have extended my answer to try and address the question in your comment. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 5, 2023 at 11:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @GiorgiLagidze it's the external force that's anisotropic, not the space that the force acts in. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 5, 2023 at 14:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @GiorgiLagidze Yes I agree. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 5, 2023 at 15:55