Timeline for Jafferis-Lewkowycz-Maldacena-Suh (JLMS) formula and tensor networks
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S May 15 at 20:07 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S May 15 at 20:07 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| May 8 at 19:56 | comment | added | VaibhavK | @lcv The JLMS formula is a result in AdS/CFT that the relative entropy on the bulk and boundary sides are equivalent following a modular construction. The subject is very clear; I am asking what it means when a tensor network model like PSSY requires corrections to the JLMS formula. | |
| May 8 at 19:09 | comment | added | lcv | The JLMS formula. Or whatever formula you claim is violated (when you say "it is said that violation can be found" I can't understand what's the subject). | |
| May 8 at 18:35 | comment | added | VaibhavK | @lcv Not violations per se but more so as in requiring corrections to the JLMS formula, which is in the question itself. What conjecture are you talking about here? | |
| May 8 at 15:06 | comment | added | lcv | When you say violations you mean violations of what? | |
| May 8 at 11:48 | comment | added | VaibhavK | @lcv Not sure where this statement is precisely said, but in general people talk about corrections to the JLMS formula arising from JT gravity coupled to EOTW branes. What conjecture are you saying will be violated? | |
| May 7 at 19:24 | comment | added | lcv | One possible bit if information is that general tensor network states (as opposed to MPS) can be constructed that have nearly maximal entanglement. | |
| May 7 at 19:22 | comment | added | lcv | Where can this statement be found? Tensor networks is simply a parametrization of a vector in the Hilbert space, so without further specifications that statement is pretty void. It amounts to say that there exist states that violate that conjecture. | |
| May 7 at 18:56 | comment | added | VaibhavK | I'm offering a bounty for 50 points from my own reputation. Now if the answers are not good enough, what do I do with this 50 points that I just lost? Hopefully someone can answer it instead. | |
| S May 7 at 18:55 | history | bounty started | VaibhavK | ||
| S May 7 at 18:55 | history | notice added | VaibhavK | Draw attention | |
| Sep 24, 2023 at 15:31 | history | edited | VaibhavK | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 6 characters in body
|
| Sep 24, 2023 at 15:29 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| S Sep 24, 2023 at 14:56 | review | First questions | |||
| Sep 24, 2023 at 15:52 | |||||
| S Sep 24, 2023 at 14:56 | history | asked | VaibhavK | CC BY-SA 4.0 |