Skip to main content
Physics

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

8
  • $\begingroup$ I'm offering a bounty for 50 points from my own reputation. Now if the answers are not good enough, what do I do with this 50 points that I just lost? Hopefully someone can answer it instead. $\endgroup$
    – VaibhavK
    Commented May 7 at 18:56
  • $\begingroup$ Where can this statement be found? Tensor networks is simply a parametrization of a vector in the Hilbert space, so without further specifications that statement is pretty void. It amounts to say that there exist states that violate that conjecture. $\endgroup$
    – lcv
    Commented May 7 at 19:22
  • $\begingroup$ One possible bit if information is that general tensor network states (as opposed to MPS) can be constructed that have nearly maximal entanglement. $\endgroup$
    – lcv
    Commented May 7 at 19:24
  • $\begingroup$ @lcv Not sure where this statement is precisely said, but in general people talk about corrections to the JLMS formula arising from JT gravity coupled to EOTW branes. What conjecture are you saying will be violated? $\endgroup$
    – VaibhavK
    Commented May 8 at 11:48
  • $\begingroup$ When you say violations you mean violations of what? $\endgroup$
    – lcv
    Commented May 8 at 15:06