Timeline for How is the index notation for the electromagnetic potentials defined?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5 at 2:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Mar 6 at 9:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jun 10, 2023 at 14:54 | answer | added | Thomas Fritsch | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 10, 2023 at 13:48 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 31 characters in body
|
| Jun 10, 2023 at 13:46 | comment | added | J.G. | An uncontracted tensor index can only ever be at one height; you've made your $i$ downstairs in $\partial_iA_0$ but upstairs in $\partial_0A^i$. For example, $E_i/c=\partial_0A_i-\partial_iA_0=F_{0i}=\eta_{0\mu}\eta_{i\nu}F^{\mu\nu}$ is fine. | |
| Jun 10, 2023 at 13:32 | history | reopened | Qmechanic♦ | ||
| S Jun 10, 2023 at 12:48 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Jun 10, 2023 at 13:36 | |||||
| S Jun 10, 2023 at 12:48 | history | edited | Kubrik | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 128 characters in body
Added to review
|
| Jun 10, 2023 at 12:40 | history | closed | Qmechanic♦ | Needs details or clarity | |
| Jun 10, 2023 at 12:34 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Jun 10, 2023 at 12:10 | history | asked | Kubrik | CC BY-SA 4.0 |