Timeline for Why is entanglement not explainable by pilot waves theory?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2022 at 2:48 | history | edited | James | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 15 characters in body
|
| Nov 2, 2022 at 21:06 | comment | added | Maximal Ideal | In Bohmian mechanics, the wave is a wave in configuration space, not real space. This is a key point where it parts ways from the fluid analogy and this is also the reason it can exhibit entanglement. (Actually, even in ordinary QM the wavefunction is a function on configuration space as well.) | |
| Nov 2, 2022 at 21:00 | answer | added | Void | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 2, 2022 at 20:02 | comment | added | Mauricio | The videos is about simulating entanglement with pilot waves in water, not about entanglement with pilot waves in QM. | |
| Nov 2, 2022 at 19:49 | answer | added | don't train ai on me | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 2, 2022 at 19:45 | comment | added | lcv | Nice question. I have a few comments. First i essentially disagree with the claim (see however the next point). I'm afraid a YouTube video is not the best source of science. My point is due to the fact that pilot wave theory is the same as quantum theory for say, positional degrees of freedom. It should however be said that it's been hard to extend pilotwave theory to spin degrees of freedom. Which is the language which is usually used to speak about entanglement (though of course not necessarily) | |
| Nov 2, 2022 at 19:36 | history | asked | James | CC BY-SA 4.0 |