Timeline for How can the integrability condition $G_{i\,\,;k}^k=0$ for Einstein's Field Equations be maintained in case of torsion?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2, 2021 at 11:15 | answer | added | Bence Racskó | timeline score: 1 | |
Jun 27, 2021 at 15:43 | history | edited | Frederic Thomas | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added the definition of a cyclic sum.
|
Jun 24, 2021 at 12:47 | comment | added | Frederic Thomas | @Jerry Schirmer: At first I thought I understood your argument, but now with the indices right I no longer understand. | |
Jun 24, 2021 at 12:45 | history | edited | Frederic Thomas | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
I expanded the cyclic sum to show better the problem
|
Jun 24, 2021 at 11:52 | history | edited | Frederic Thomas | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
I put the indices right in the last equation.
|
Jun 20, 2021 at 14:08 | comment | added | Zo the Relativist | Sorry, I typoed out the upper index. Irrespecitvely, you're symmetrizing over anti-symmetric indices. | |
Jun 19, 2021 at 22:44 | comment | added | Frederic Thomas | @Jerry Schirmer what do you mean with $T_{ab}$ -- the torsion tensor has 3 indices. So $T_{ab}$ is the energy-momentum tensor ? | |
Jun 19, 2021 at 20:09 | comment | added | Zo the Relativist | Won't that sum over cyclic KLM create a bunch of pairs of $T_{ab}$ + $T_{ba}$? | |
Jun 19, 2021 at 19:58 | history | asked | Frederic Thomas | CC BY-SA 4.0 |