Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I don't know the answer, but it's probably a truism that if the electrons can move around well enough to emit photons, they can equally well absorb similar photons. I assume this is true of a plasma, for example. I suppose different frequencies (energies) could be involved. In which case, maybe red-hot glass is still transparent to UV? $\endgroup$
    – Roger Wood
    Commented Jan 9, 2021 at 5:52
  • $\begingroup$ @RogerWood Yes, that must be right. I think there is an experiment to be done at a glassblower's shop with a photodiode, a meter, and a red, green and blue laser pointer and some kind of pyrometer. Plotting the attenuation at three wavelengths as a function of temperature might show the red attenuation start to increase before noticeable in the blue. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Jan 9, 2021 at 6:01
  • $\begingroup$ I have a hunch that thermal excitation first moves electrons to higher bands allowing them to radiate - no. In solids and liquids the light is emitted by black body emission not by transitions between excited states. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 9, 2021 at 7:32
  • $\begingroup$ See What are the various physical mechanisms for energy transfer to the photon during blackbody emission?. I won't close your question, but I do think it's basically a duplicate of this. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 9, 2021 at 7:34
  • $\begingroup$ @JohnRennie blackbody emission is not a mechanism. The emission process is the opposite of whatever absorption proceses stop you seeing through the glass. $\endgroup$
    – ProfRob
    Commented Jan 9, 2021 at 10:08