Timeline for Solving Maxwell equations on curved spacetime
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7 at 20:46 | history | edited | Níckolas Alves | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| S Jun 13, 2020 at 2:06 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Jun 13, 2020 at 2:06 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Jun 11, 2020 at 11:38 | comment | added | user255856 | I will look into it | |
| Jun 10, 2020 at 14:53 | comment | added | honeste_vivere | Have you looked at hep.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/rotatingEM.pdf? | |
| Jun 7, 2020 at 23:45 | comment | added | Alex Trounev | @jojo123456 Probably they just try to solve equation $g_{ik}=\eta _{\mu \nu}e^{\mu}_ie^{\nu}_k$. | |
| Jun 7, 2020 at 17:13 | comment | added | user255856 | That's one point which I don't understand. Why do they chose these particular $e^{\mu}$'s? I tried to invert $g_{\mu\nu}$ to make the frame locally Minkowski, but that seems not to be what they mean? | |
| Jun 6, 2020 at 20:23 | comment | added | Alex Trounev | Before equation (48) they pointed out that "Any physical measurement by an observer in curved spacetime should be carried out in a local inertial frame, i.e., the observable quantities are the projections of the physical quantities on to the four orthonormal bases $e^{\mu}_0, e^{\mu}_1, e^{\mu}_2,e^{\mu}_3$ carried by the observer. Therefore, the observable EM fields are $F_{\alpha \beta}=F_{\mu \nu}e^{\mu}_{\alpha}e^{\nu}_{\beta}$" | |
| Jun 6, 2020 at 20:06 | comment | added | user255856 | $F^{\mu\nu}_{(1)}$ has no definition when I do the expansion. It is the function that I am looking for. At the stage of the expansion just consider it as an expersiion which contains one $h$. If you look at the end result you can see that this makes sense | |
| Jun 5, 2020 at 19:13 | comment | added | Stratiev | Where you have defined the expansion of $F^{\mu \nu}$ as an expansion in powers of h, I don't quite understand what you mean, since there is no $h$ multiplying the $F^{\mu \nu}_{(1)}$ term. Is it a power series in $det(h_{\mu \nu})$? | |
| Jun 5, 2020 at 15:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1268920540317863937 | ||
| S Jun 5, 2020 at 0:04 | history | bounty started | CommunityBot | ||
| S Jun 5, 2020 at 0:04 | history | notice added | user255856 | Draw attention | |
| Jun 1, 2020 at 12:16 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags; edited tags
|
|
| Jun 1, 2020 at 12:13 | history | asked | user255856 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |