Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • $\begingroup$ Can you elaborate the expansion? Is the usual expression for the derivative of an exponential not valid for matrix exponentials? $\endgroup$
    – gbaso
    Commented Jan 11, 2013 at 22:32
  • $\begingroup$ @Ganondolf see the update. $\endgroup$
    – kηives
    Commented Jan 11, 2013 at 23:18
  • $\begingroup$ Uhm, I think I sorted out... Most probably I missed a commutator in the interaction term, which accounts for an extra term in the transformation of G. More important, as you suggested I should keep everything to first order, that should be the way to transform correctly the field strength tensor. I still don't know how exactly, but now I should be on the right way... Dropping the problem now for lack of time, but at least I saw the light at the end of the tunnel. Thank you. $\endgroup$
    – gbaso
    Commented Jan 12, 2013 at 0:32