Timeline for Relating the Yang-Mills field-strength to the Maxwell tensor in $SU(2)$ gauge theory
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2019 at 17:03 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| May 27, 2019 at 5:06 | history | edited | Subhaneil Lahiri | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Non BPS case
|
| May 27, 2019 at 0:08 | vote | accept | Othin | ||
| May 24, 2019 at 18:07 | vote | accept | Othin | ||
| May 27, 2019 at 0:08 | |||||
| May 21, 2019 at 21:30 | vote | accept | Othin | ||
| May 21, 2019 at 21:30 | |||||
| May 21, 2019 at 20:31 | comment | added | Othin | Thank you, I had forgotten to differentiate the unit vector in the $a_{\nu}\hat{\Phi}$ terms, so I couldn't get the cancelation. It works now. | |
| May 21, 2019 at 20:17 | comment | added | Subhaneil Lahiri | If you pull $a_{\mu}$ out of the commutator and use the first identity, you get something proportional to $(\partial_{[\mu} \hat{\Phi}) a_{\nu]}$. This cancels with a term from $\partial_{[\mu}(a_{\nu]} \hat{\Phi})$. | |
| May 21, 2019 at 19:05 | comment | added | Othin | Thanks, that helped a lot. I think I'm almost there now but there remain a term proportional to $[\hat{\Phi}a_{\mu},[\partial_{\nu}\hat{\Phi},\hat{\Phi}]]$ and one with μ,ν interchanged in the calculation of Fμν. Not sure why they should vanish | |
| May 19, 2019 at 23:57 | history | edited | Subhaneil Lahiri | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| May 19, 2019 at 23:51 | history | answered | Subhaneil Lahiri | CC BY-SA 4.0 |