When you apply the brakes we all know it produces a net force backwards so we all know the resultant force is acting backwards  . But when the resultant foce acts backwards it doen ot mean that the object should travel backwards  .

At the instant the the brakes are applied the object has a certain velocity  , lets take it as V1 ehich is positive assuming the car moves backwards at the the same instant meaning it should have a V2 which is negative. (Note that: velocity is a vector so the direction is really important.  ) This situation causes the object to have a infinite decellaration considering the resultant force stays constant  .

1. Decellartion can never be infinity.
2. Once the object has a zero velocity it will never travel backwards because friction is an opposing force when there is motion , Now there is no motion so no friction  .Therefore no resultant force resulting in no motion.

Normally a graph for velocity when braking is like this.

When you apply the brakes we all know they produce a net force backwards so we all know the resultant force is acting backwards. But when the resultant force acts backwards it does not mean that the object should travel backwards.

At the instant the brakes are applied, the object has a certain velocity, let's take it as $V_1$ which is positive, assuming the car moves backwards at the same instant, meaning it should have a $V_2$ which is negative. (Note that: velocity is a vector, so the direction is really important.) This situation causes the object to have an infinite deceleration, considering the resultant force stays constant.

1. Deceleration can never be infinity.
2. Once the object has a velocity, it will never travel backwards, because friction is an opposing force when there is motion. Now there is no motion, so no friction. Therefore no resultant force resulting in no motion.

Normally a graph for velocity when braking is like this.