Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I don't think that is true. What is your source? $\endgroup$
    – lmr
    Commented Jun 9, 2018 at 10:30
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @lmr You're right, Dynamo theory contradicts this answer. The moving water produces a secondary field, which is not the subject of this question. $\endgroup$
    – user191954
    Commented Jun 9, 2018 at 10:56