Timeline for Norton's dome and its equation
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2023 at 1:37 | answer | added | user365016 | timeline score: -1 | |
| Jul 13, 2022 at 7:55 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
minus is not in Norton's version
|
| Jun 8, 2022 at 19:21 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body; edited tags
|
| Dec 26, 2017 at 14:44 | answer | added | Gruff | timeline score: 10 | |
| Sep 8, 2015 at 21:28 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | Related question on Math.SE: math.stackexchange.com/q/1426755/11127 | |
| Oct 14, 2012 at 4:36 | comment | added | Dzamo Norton | I wonder if this problem goes away if you allow only $C^\infty$ (infinitely differentiable) solutions to the equations of motion, or if a dome can be contrived so that a Bump Function of time is a solution. | |
| Oct 12, 2012 at 17:48 | answer | added | Qmechanic♦ | timeline score: 26 | |
| Oct 12, 2012 at 12:03 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
retagged;
|
| Oct 12, 2012 at 9:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/256680998966788096 | ||
| Oct 12, 2012 at 8:52 | answer | added | Luboš Motl | timeline score: 26 | |
| Oct 12, 2012 at 8:44 | history | edited | Luboš Motl | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 149 characters in body
|
| Oct 12, 2012 at 7:25 | history | edited | David Z |
edited tags
|
|
| Oct 12, 2012 at 6:08 | history | asked | countunique | CC BY-SA 3.0 |