Timeline for QCD pion and electroweak symmetry breaking
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2022 at 20:34 | comment | added | Cosmas Zachos | ... so a propagating pion which is less than 0.05% higgs is not a big deal: do the calculation! | |
| Nov 13, 2022 at 18:45 | comment | added | Cosmas Zachos | You may mix pions and Higgs goldstons, as described, and gauge-absorb one linear combination, while leaving the other one as a propagating physical field. "Eating", in this sense, is a narrowly and strictly defined operation, not a fantasy procedure, as you might be misconstruing it as... | |
| Nov 13, 2022 at 17:41 | comment | added | Petra Axolotl | I guess it depends on what we mean by "eaten". We say the three Higgs Goldstones are eaten, because we could redefine the SU(2) scaler field and set those Goldstones to zero, and the two Ws and Z become massive. In the case of pions, although they couple to Ws and Z, I don't see how to set the pions to zero and to make Ws or Z massive at the same time. | |
| Sep 30, 2017 at 2:46 | comment | added | Cosmas Zachos | Yes, indeed... . | |
| Sep 30, 2017 at 1:27 | comment | added | Liberty | Thank you for a clear answer. Can you explain the last comments that you mentioned as a sequel question? Do you refer to technicolor model? | |
| Sep 30, 2017 at 0:19 | vote | accept | Liberty | ||
| Sep 29, 2017 at 21:56 | history | edited | Cosmas Zachos | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Sep 29, 2017 at 19:22 | history | edited | Cosmas Zachos | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
renumbered eons to comport with new numbering of question.
|
| Sep 29, 2017 at 15:53 | history | edited | Cosmas Zachos | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Sep 29, 2017 at 15:45 | history | answered | Cosmas Zachos | CC BY-SA 3.0 |