Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 9, 2017 at 11:42 vote accept EEEB
Aug 21, 2016 at 5:15 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Oct 23, 2015 at 2:13 history tweeted twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/657379206192590848
Oct 21, 2015 at 13:58 comment added Thomas I see what you are asking.
Oct 21, 2015 at 13:42 answer added Thomas timeline score: 4
Oct 21, 2015 at 11:04 comment added EEEB Isn't $U(1)_{PQ}$ itself anomalous? The dynamical solution (axion) is related to the spontaneous symmetry breaking of $U(1)_{PQ}$. How can an anomalous $U(1)_{PQ}$ lead to the appearance of a Goldstone boson? Judging by the fact that indeed $U(1)_A$ because it is anomalous it doesn't lead to Goldstones in the spectrum.
Oct 21, 2015 at 3:11 comment added Thomas There is (somewhat related, but different) puzzle called the strong CP problem. The existence of the amomaly makes it clear that the $\theta$ parameter is physical, and that observables do depend on it. But $\theta$ violates CP, so it must be very small. The $U(1)_{PQ}$ is a symmetry of a proposed extension of QCD, in which $\theta=0$ dynamically. However, you should keep in mind that i) there is nothing wrong with setting $\theta=0$ by hand, ii) there is no evidence for axions.
Oct 21, 2015 at 3:08 comment added Thomas I think you are confusing the U(1) puzzle and the strong CP problem. There is no problem with the anomalous U(1)_A. Because of the anomaly no Goldstone boson is expected, and indeed none is observed.
Oct 20, 2015 at 22:53 history edited Qmechanic CC BY-SA 3.0
added 5 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Oct 20, 2015 at 22:16 history asked EEEB CC BY-SA 3.0