Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Talking about Bohr model: I don't think it's explain it at all; in modern theories the thickness of absorption/emitting lines due to the uncertainty principle (the one about time-energy). And this was discovered far later than the Bohr model. $\endgroup$
    – m0nhawk
    Commented Mar 29, 2015 at 16:01
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Bohr's model was a kludge that barely lasted a decade as the model that scientists actually used. It's still taught, not because it is right but because (a) it's easy and (b) it is a stepping stone to a better theory. With emphasis on the easy part. This question was never tackled in it. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 29, 2015 at 16:02
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think the Bohr model can solve for this, but see this answer for the modern QM physics.stackexchange.com/questions/443054/… $\endgroup$
    – user213887
    Commented Dec 7, 2018 at 15:59
  • $\begingroup$ If they had no thickness, that would be much harder to explain. How could the universe work in such a way that a photon will get absorbed if and only if it's a precise frequency? I think the lines are thin because the fine structure constant is small. $\endgroup$
    – Timothy
    Commented Nov 30, 2019 at 3:05