Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

8
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Do the calculations and fail for 5cm? NEVER! The pride of the engineers is on stake! $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 18, 2015 at 11:21
  • 50
    $\begingroup$ I can't find any NASA documentation, but Frank Borman explicitly says he recalls Apollo 8's final position error after lunar orbit insertion was "about a mile and a half from where we were supposed to be" - he quotes this in the Apollo 8 interviews and footage from "When We Left Earth". So this complements your answer nicely: actual positional errors were 4 to 5 orders of magnitude greater than GR's effect. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 18, 2015 at 11:27
  • 43
    $\begingroup$ @WetSavannaAnimalakaRodVance - This error you mentioned alarmed NASA greatly. They formed multiple tiger teams to investigate it. It turned out that this ~2 km error was mostly a result of five large mascons (mass concentrations) on the near side of the Moon. After correcting for these mascons, Apollo 12 landed within ~160 meters of the intended target. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 18, 2015 at 17:32
  • 21
    $\begingroup$ Regarding those mascons, the "Bizarre Lunar Orbits" article at nasa.gov makes for some interesting reading. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 18, 2015 at 17:36
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ @DavidHammen That is interesting reading - I had no idea that the Moon was so lumpy. From the article "an astronaut in full spacesuit and life-support gear whose lunar weight was exactly 50 pounds at the edge of the mascon would weigh 50 pounds and 4 ounces when standing in the mascon's center" $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 18, 2015 at 22:48