Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • $\begingroup$ Are you sure about those numbers? 150 million kilometres is about the radius of the Earth's orbit so, to my uninformed eye, 100 Suns seems like a very low mass for such a large object, especially as one naively thinks of black holes as being exceptionally dense. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 24, 2014 at 15:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It is 100 million suns and Kip Thorne admits that realistically it should be on the order of 200 million suns but 100 million is the quoted number since it is sort of a nice sounding whole number. $\endgroup$
    – K7PEH
    Commented Nov 24, 2014 at 15:40
  • $\begingroup$ Have they published those papers already? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 25, 2014 at 7:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Sorry, fixed that: It is indeed a 100 million Suns. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 25, 2014 at 14:24