Skip to main content

All Questions

8 votes
5 answers
2k views

Why do people not use large f-numbers (small apertures) when shooting landscapes, when you want large depth of field?

When some people take photos of the landscape, why do they not use like a low f-stop like f/32, because wouldn't you want everyone in focus because it's a landscape? But quite a lot of people use f-...
Marcus's user avatar
  • 117
21 votes
3 answers
8k views

How can a smartphone take pictures of a landscape with everything in focus?

After the announcement of the new Samsung Galaxy S9 with the new camera that changes aperture, I caught myself wondering: if smartphones have such a wide aperture (f/2.8, f/2.2, etc), how are ...
paulovlobato's user avatar
1 vote
5 answers
3k views

Does shooting landscape at lower f-stop produce reasonably sharp images?

This article argues that, 50mm prime lenses, on the other hand, have a maximum aperture of somewhere between f1.2 and f2, letting you hand hold photos in much lower light levels (they also give ...
sherlock's user avatar
  • 683
1 vote
3 answers
2k views

Why are big apertures used for landscape photography?

If it is true that a large aperture means shallow depth of field..a.k.a near objects in focus and background or far objects in blur, then how come big aperture is recommended for landscape photography?...
Victor's user avatar
  • 349
2 votes
3 answers
5k views

Why didn't I get bokeh with my 50mm f1.8?

Recently I took a photograph at an aperture of f/1.8, but there was very little bokeh. The shot was of a wave with a few boats in the background. Everything seems to be clear even at f/1.8. Can ...
Harsha's user avatar
  • 37