Skip to main content

All Questions

1 vote
5 answers
172 views

Is there some sort of disconnect between the math we use and our "observed phenomena" in reality?

So my question comes from two questions on this site one of them being my own, How small can we measure space? and Is the (surprising) applicability of mathematics to the physical world a brute fact ...
How why e's user avatar
  • 1,539
2 votes
3 answers
280 views

Metaphysical theories for why physics has the structure it has

The laws of physics have an extremely rich structure. The more fundamental you go, the more complex it becomes (e.g. Quantum Mechanics is more complex (no pun) than Newtonian mechanics). This ...
Ryder Rude's user avatar
2 votes
4 answers
266 views

If we simulate a universe just like ours, is there any experiment simulated life could do to verify it is being simulated?

Akin to Einstein's principle of equivalence where the observer cannot tell if he or she is either in free fall or being accelerated (in a small enough region of spacetime); I'm wondering the same ...
Mmm Donuts's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
53 views

Can our creativity create probability for reality? How legitimate is modal realism?

That title is so wild but if you create say a cartoon and that universe. Does that open up the possibility that it exists somewhere in reality? Like it is now a universe that exists because you ...
Summer TK's user avatar
4 votes
5 answers
322 views

In our best scientific theories, is there a difference between "the universe" and "reality"?

In our best scientific theories, is there a difference between "the universe" and "reality"? Are all scientific realists committed to the idea that there is a mind independent ...
user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
171 views

Does reality change? when you many theories [closed]

for example things appear and disappear.
joseph's user avatar
  • 3
0 votes
1 answer
171 views

Why do we rely upon scientific approach when its foundational axioms are assumed and agreed without proof?

Why do we rely upon scientific approach when its foundational axioms are assumed and agreed without proof? Foundation of the scientific explorations are seem to be the mathematical axioms at its root....
Sazzad Hissain Khan's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
491 views

Is our civilization based on a illusion?

I have not studied philosophy although find interesting reading about. According to new theories in modern physics the concept of matter is an illusion. Matter is just a wave. We understand materials ...
Anastasios Vlasopoulos's user avatar
7 votes
3 answers
1k views

Does Einstein's local realism in quantum mechanics imply superdeterminism?

Einstein insisted that nature is locally real, which is also know as counterfactual defeniteness and means that results of experiments are predetermined. But, if everything is predetermined in every ...
Valentin Tihomirov's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
339 views

Would truly random events be strictly equivalent to events without a cause?

There are a couple of questions (one, another) about this topic, and as I was thinking about this for a while, I started wondering whether there has been any systematic research into this that raises ...
Leo Heinsaar's user avatar
23 votes
9 answers
27k views

Does True Randomness actually exist? [duplicate]

I tend to think of randomness as a lack of complete information when it comes to knowing something. If we look at the history of probability theory it centers on a lack of knowing the exact outcome of ...
Pete1187's user avatar
  • 557
2 votes
3 answers
224 views

A final end to the depth we can investigate reality?

The higher energies we use the deeper we look into the mysteries of the universe. We started to find molecules, atoms, protons, quarks, ... All at different energy scales. Each new stage forced and ...
draks ...'s user avatar
  • 768
1 vote
1 answer
129 views

Do questions about the ultimate truth make sense? Are we capable of understanding the system in which we live? (Looking for directions/references)

I am recently reading a lot about topics like free will or consciousness. It seems that many philosophers are trying to argue about these concepts in an ultimate and final way, that means they are ...
Dennis Weyland's user avatar
4 votes
3 answers
395 views

How do laws of nature enforce themselves?

The Humean view prevailing today is that laws of nature are mere regularities of the empirical events. However, there seems to be a difference between post factum regularities, like the Titius-Bode ...
Conifold's user avatar
  • 43.4k
0 votes
2 answers
208 views

Does the analogy "dog is to proximal environment as human is to Reality" portend anything for a maximum theoretical level of intelligence?

As today has been a day for analogies: dog : proximal environment :: human : Reality A dog's ontology is presumably quite limited. A human's ontology is apparently maximal. While our average ...
Dise's user avatar
  • 79

15 30 50 per page