Skip to main content

All Questions

Tagged with
2 votes
3 answers
117 views

Does set-theoretic pluralism, about axiom systems, inevitably become an invitation to non-axiomatic systems of set theory?

Per Hamkins[[11][12]] (see also his [22]), if no individual axiom is too sacred to be denied in some possible world,Q and so if no collection of such axioms is so sacred either, yet then: The ...
Kristian Berry's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
168 views

Basic truths as self-justified or parajustified

Some foundationalists maintain that basic truths are self-justifying, which means they are allowing, in some exceptional cases at least, a form of circular reasoning; petitio principii or begging the ...
user1113719's user avatar
2 votes
3 answers
597 views

What are the most rational basic beliefs?

I understand that this question might be difficult or even unresolved. But within a foundationalist view of knowledge, has anyone proposed a set of basic beliefs that seem to be the most rational for ...
blue-raven's user avatar