Skip to main content

All Questions

0 votes
0 answers
63 views

Turing machines, thinking and category mistakes

According to my recollection, some philosophers have argued that it is a category mistake to ascribe intelligence to Turing machines, because Turing machines are abstract mathematical objects. What ...
Frode Alfson Bjørdal's user avatar
1 vote
3 answers
1k views

Is non-deterministic automated reasoning a viable strategy for solving problems in mathematical logic?

EDIT 2023/10/06 There are objections that this is too technical to be philosophy, and while I've seen questions on this forum go far beyond what I'm asking here in set theory, computability theory, ...
J D's user avatar
  • 29.2k
0 votes
1 answer
941 views

What is the difference between the resolution rule and the elimination in natural deduction?

I understand that elimination is: p v q ¬q then p and resolution is: q1 v q2 v q3...qn ¬q1 v q2 v q3...qn then q2 v q3...qn I see no difference, but my teacher is telling us don't use the ...
javiera's user avatar
2 votes
3 answers
612 views

Understanding the simulation argument

I came across Nick Bostrom's paper called Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?. The paper argues that at least one of the following propositions is true: The human species is likely to go extinct ...
Mr. President's user avatar
1 vote
4 answers
389 views

Does "technological unemployment" violate the second law of thermodynamics?

Marx claimed that machines cannot "produce surplus value" but only redistribute labor and provide individual firms with a temporary market advantage. Nonetheless, many thinkers across the spectrum ...
Nelson Alexander's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
231 views

What fallacy assumes that being familiar with something makes one an expert on it?

In the article Why We Shouldn't Fear Artificial Intelligence, the author writes:"A common fallacy suggests that, because AI are hosted on computers, they’ll be good at manipulating them. But let me ...
bobby nolar's user avatar
13 votes
6 answers
2k views

Does Gödel's argument that minds are more powerful than computers have the inconsistency loophole?

In "Raatikainen, P., 2005, “On the Philosophical Relevance of Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems,” , the author argues that Penrose's and others use of Gödel's theorem as an argument against mechanism (...
Alexander S King's user avatar
3 votes
3 answers
312 views

What is the general relationship between Intelligence and Information?

I will take the definition of "information" used in the field of Information Theory, which according to my understanding of Information Theory, information is the loss of uncertainty(e.g. while a coin ...
user63152's user avatar
-1 votes
4 answers
152 views

Why is the Kochsche Curve and programming so similiar? [closed]

I've question which I'm looking for longer time. The iteration process while a for loop > for statement in function_declaration: is looping over all instances and giving out one statement after ...
Tobias MiWil Fank's user avatar
5 votes
3 answers
181 views

Do limits of human nature suggest that it could be principally understood?

Human nature is limited, so is our thinking. We are limited by our bodies, and power of thoughts is limited by the number of cortical and other neurons, number and speed of their connections, which ...
sanmai's user avatar
  • 183
2 votes
4 answers
2k views

Strong AI vs Gödel's Theorem?

If Gödel's Theorem is true, it means that for every formal system, there is a thesis that is true but can't be proven from the formal system. Every agent system which humans can build by modern ...
logician's user avatar
  • 131