Skip to main content

All Questions

1 vote
2 answers
761 views

The person in the Chinese Room Argument is a strong AI

For those who don't know, here is a description of the Chinese Room Argument. The argument is essentially that even if an AI may give the impression of being intelligent because they answer questions ...
haxor789's user avatar
  • 6,926
-2 votes
2 answers
206 views

Is anything wrong with this argument about the Turing test?

I seem to be having a bit of difficulty explaining what seems to me to be an important failure of the Turing test as performed. A failure that means that to date, no performance has yielded any ...
Roddus's user avatar
  • 721
3 votes
3 answers
805 views

What does Searle mean by "intentionality" and "causal processes"?

I am struggling to understand the meaning of some of the terminology John Searle uses in "Mind, brains, and programs." For example, right before "IV. The combination reply," he ...
Vasting's user avatar
  • 173
31 votes
18 answers
13k views

Why is it impossible for a program or AI to have semantic understanding?

relatively new to philosophy. This question is based on John Searle's Chinese Room Argument. I find it odd that his main argument for why programs could not think was that because programs could only ...
Abraham's user avatar
  • 503
5 votes
5 answers
420 views

Is AI in a Crisis of Science?

According to Thomas S. Kuhn in his classic work, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: ...'normal science' presupposes a conceptual and instrumental framework or paradigm accepted by an entire ...
Roddus's user avatar
  • 721
2 votes
1 answer
493 views

An English room inside Searle's Chinese Room?

The Chinese room experiment has a fundamental function of giving the system/person interacting with it the illusion that the room understands chinese, but it seems flaky to me what the term ...
Weezy's user avatar
  • 389
1 vote
1 answer
221 views

A reply to the Chinese room argument

All replies to the Chinese Room Argument (CRA) that I've seen assume the computer science concept (explanation, "definition" as Searle says) of the electronic digital computer. But what of other ...
Roddus's user avatar
  • 721
4 votes
1 answer
861 views

Does strong AI disprove physicalism?

This question is motivated by a comment to an answer I provided to another question about John Searle and the Chinese Room Argument: What relevance, if any, does collective memory in ants have to John ...
Frank Hubeny's user avatar
  • 19.5k
3 votes
1 answer
743 views

What is Searle's argument against machine functionalism?

what is searle's main argument Machine functionalism?
Abhed Manocha's user avatar
4 votes
6 answers
386 views

How could a computer acquire knowledge of its environment?

I've quite often seen AI respond to John Searle's Chinese room argument by accepting the systems reply: while the man in the room doesn't understand Chinese, the room (the system) as a whole could - ...
Roddus's user avatar
  • 721
3 votes
1 answer
2k views

Can computers do things Turing machines can't?

Today's electronic digital computers are often referred to as universal Turing machines. That is, the concept of the UTM is used to understand today's stored-program electronic digital computers. But ...
Roddus's user avatar
  • 721
6 votes
7 answers
1k views

Why doesn't the Chinese room learn Chinese?

I just can't see how John Searle's Chinese room makes sense. The room passes the Turing test. People outside the room think there's a human inside who understands Chinese. But, Searle explains, the ...
Roddus's user avatar
  • 721
1 vote
2 answers
253 views

Does adding structure make the Chinese room semantic?

The Chinese room reacts just to syntax, or shape of symbols (is purely syntactic). But brains are full of structure. In the room, Chinese symbols sit scattered in "piles" on the floor or are moved ...
Roddus's user avatar
  • 721
2 votes
0 answers
218 views

Do relationships rebut the Chinese room argument?

Searle says syntax is neither sufficient for nor constitutive of semantics, all a computer gets (eg from sensors) is syntax (tokenised shapes) therefore computers will never understand the world. ...
Roddus's user avatar
  • 721
-1 votes
3 answers
362 views

The Chinese room ain't no computer – but does it matter? [duplicate]

Central to Searle's Chinese room argument is his claim that the room has the semantic properties of an electronic digital computer. In a post a few days ago in a discussion about the semantics, I ...
Roddus's user avatar
  • 721

15 30 50 per page